From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stroh v. Gross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2000
269 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued February 2, 1999

February 17, 2000

In an action, inter alia, for an injunction enjoining certain construction on the defendant's property, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Newmark, J.), dated September 30, 1997, which granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction.

Graubard Mollen Miller, New York, N.Y. (Milton Mollen and John P. Sheridan of counsel), for appellant.

Regina Seltzer, Bellport, N.Y., for respondent.

LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant's contentions have been rendered academic by a subsequent order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Emerson, J.), dated January 26, 1999 (see, Stroh v. Gross, 269 A.D.2d 384; [Appellate Division Docket No. 1999-01528, decided herewith]).


Summaries of

Stroh v. Gross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2000
269 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Stroh v. Gross

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES STROH, respondent, v. PATRICIA GROSS, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 17, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
702 N.Y.S.2d 874

Citing Cases

Metro PCS N.Y., LLC v. Inc. Vil. of Southampton

The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and…