From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strobel v. County of Lewis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 3, 1989
147 A.D.2d 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

February 3, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Lewis County, Lynch, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs and claimants' motion granted. Memorandum: The court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying claimants' application to extend the time to serve a notice of claim on their own behalf pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5). The hospital had actual notice of the facts constituting the claim by virtue of its possession of medical records pertaining to Mrs. Strobel's care and treatment at the hospital (see, Kavanaugh v Memorial Hosp. Nursing Home, 126 A.D.2d 930, 931). The operative facts of the treatment rendered by the hospital form the basis of its alleged negligence and would be contained in its own record (see, Rechenberger v Nassau County Med. Center, 112 A.D.2d 150, 152). The hospital has not shown any prejudice as a result of the delay and, given its actual notice, it is unlikely that any prejudice could be established (see, Matter of Beary v City of Rye, 44 N.Y.2d 398, 412-413; Kavanaugh v Memorial Hosp. Nursing Home, supra, at 931-932; Rechenberger v Nassau County Med. Center, supra). In our view, the reasons given by claimants for the delay in filing the notice of claim are sufficient on this record.


Summaries of

Strobel v. County of Lewis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 3, 1989
147 A.D.2d 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Strobel v. County of Lewis

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY STROBEL et al., Appellants, v. COUNTY OF LEWIS, as Owner and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 3, 1989

Citations

147 A.D.2d 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
537 N.Y.S.2d 707

Citing Cases

Tyson v. ROSWELL CANCER INST.

Regarding prejudice, the court has considered that the records necessary to investigate the circumstances…

Claim of Tyson v. Roswell Park Cancer Institute Corp.

Regarding prejudice, the court has considered that the records necessary to investigate the circumstances…