From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strauss v. Rabe

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 19, 1925
98 N.J. Eq. 700 (N.J. 1925)

Opinion

Argued May term, 1925.

Decided October 19th, 1925.

Messrs. Bauer Ranker, for the appellant.

Messrs. Melosh, Morten Melosh, for the respondents.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Bentley, whose opinion is reported in 97 N.J. Eq. 208.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bentley.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Strauss v. Rabe

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 19, 1925
98 N.J. Eq. 700 (N.J. 1925)
Case details for

Strauss v. Rabe

Case Details

Full title:JACOB STRAUSS, appellant, v. AUGUST RABE et al., respondents

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 19, 1925

Citations

98 N.J. Eq. 700 (N.J. 1925)

Citing Cases

Texas Co. v. Adams

I do not think the defendant should be estopped from setting up a defense which seemed to him a valid one…

Tansey v. Belleville Relief Association

There was no memorandum, letter, note or other documentary evidence of the alleged contract produced or…