In Strause v. Josephthal, 77 N.Y. 622, all that was held was that a manual delivery of a bond and mortgage when it is intended that the actual transfer shall be made later by a written assignment does not pass title.
Summary of this case from BUNT v. D'ANDREAArgued May 22, 1879
Decided June 3, 1879
Seig Spingam for appellants.
Benj. M. Stilwell for respondent.
FOLGER, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur, except ANDREWS, J., absent at argument.
Judgment affirmed.
In Strause v. Josephthal, 77 N.Y. 622, all that was held was that a manual delivery of a bond and mortgage when it is intended that the actual transfer shall be made later by a written assignment does not pass title.
Summary of this case from BUNT v. D'ANDREAFull title:HENRIETTA STRAUSE, Respondent, v . MORITZ JOSEPHTHAL et al., Appellants
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 3, 1879
Possession of these is presumed to be lawful. Boardman v. Lake Shore Mich. S.R., 84 N.Y. 157, 177; Wigm. Ev.…
Nash v. Moore( Marden v. Dorthy, 160 N.Y. 39, 58; Nahe v. Bauer, No. 1, 141 App. Div. 115.) The respondents cannot support…