Summary
noting that group pleading was “particularly problematic” where the Court attempted to discern who was subject to the Stratton Court's jurisdiction
Summary of this case from Nelson v. ClaussenOpinion
Civil Action 22-466-RGA
07-27-2023
PAUL STRATTON, Plaintiff, v. iM3NY, LLC, IMPERIUM3 NEW YORK, INC., CHAITANYA SHARMA, SHAILESH UPRETI, and FRANK POULLAS, Defendants.
ORDER
RICHARD G. ANDREWS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This 27th day of July 2023, upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation dated July 11, 2023 (D.I. 52), and no objections to the Report and
Recommendation having been received, and the Court having reviewed the matter and finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is legally and factually correct, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Report and Recommendation (D.I. 52) is ADOPTED.
2. Defendants motion to dismiss the amended complaint (D.I. 27) is GRANTED.