From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strasser v. Silverman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1930
231 App. Div. 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

December, 1930.


Order in so far as it grants plaintiff leave to amend his complaint upon condition and in so far as it denies motion of defendant Edith Silverman for judgment on her counterclaim against the defendant insurance company affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; the amended complaint to be served within ten days from the entry of the order herein. In our opinion, the former designees under the policy of Amelia and David R. Cohen should be made parties to the action and their claim to the fund, if any, litigated. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Strasser v. Silverman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1930
231 App. Div. 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Strasser v. Silverman

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK L. STRASSER, as Administrator, etc., of LEOPOLD STRASSER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1930

Citations

231 App. Div. 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Citing Cases

San Francisco Breweries v. Schurtz

The fact that the mortgage was properly drawn does not validate the mortgage if the affidavit is…