From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stralberg v. Mauer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 1990
166 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

October 9, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record reveals that medical issues are raised in this case which warrant referral to a medical malpractice panel (see, Bleich v. Bono, 91 A.D.2d 911; Rosa v. Kulkarni, 89 A.D.2d 529; Matter of Colton v. Riccobono, 67 N.Y.2d 571). Since the plaintiff is entitled to a trial preference based on the medical malpractice issues raised in the action, she is not automatically entitled to another preference based on her age (see, Green v Vogel, 144 A.D.2d 66; CPLR 3403 [a]). Whether exceptional circumstances exist which require measures to facilitate a prompt trial such as an expedited hearing before a medical malpractice panel, is a matter left to the discretion of the trial court. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stralberg v. Mauer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 1990
166 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Stralberg v. Mauer

Case Details

Full title:ERNA STRALBERG, Appellant, v. IRVING MAUER et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 9, 1990

Citations

166 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
560 N.Y.S.2d 804

Citing Cases

White v. Metro. Opera Assns.

Lastly, we agree with the second department that CPLR 3403(a) does not automatically entitle a litigant to…

Rivera v. Campodonico

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The Supreme Court properly denied…