From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stovall v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Aug 31, 2000
768 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 2000)

Opinion

No. SC95059.

Opinion filed August 31, 2000.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict, Fifth District — No. 5D97-2556 (Volusia County).

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Susan A. Fagan, Assistant Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Petitioner

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Kellie A. Nielan, Mary G. Jolley, Belle B. Schumann, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Respondent.


We have for review Stovall v. State, 727 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), a decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal citing as controlling authority its decision in Maddox v. State, 708 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), approved in part, disapproved in part, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla. 2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla. 1981). We quash the district court's decision in this case and remand for consideration in light of our opinion inMaddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla. 2000).

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur. Page 446 — 463


Summaries of

Stovall v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Aug 31, 2000
768 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 2000)
Case details for

Stovall v. State

Case Details

Full title:PAUL O. STOVALL, Petitioner v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Aug 31, 2000

Citations

768 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 2000)

Citing Cases

Stovall v. State

On the initial appeal, we refused to consider certain alleged sentencing errors because of our holding in…