From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Story v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Feb 14, 2013
NO: 5:12CV00278 SWW (E.D. Ark. Feb. 14, 2013)

Opinion

NO: 5:12CV00278 SWW

02-14-2013

KENDRICK C. STORY ADC #109934 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants' motions for summary judgment (docket entries #65 & #70) are GRANTED, and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED.

2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to his claims regarding his assignment to field work.

3. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in all other respects.

Susan Webber Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Story v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Feb 14, 2013
NO: 5:12CV00278 SWW (E.D. Ark. Feb. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Story v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:KENDRICK C. STORY ADC #109934 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Feb 14, 2013

Citations

NO: 5:12CV00278 SWW (E.D. Ark. Feb. 14, 2013)