From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stone v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 15, 2022
No. A23A0196 (Ga. Ct. App. Sep. 15, 2022)

Opinion

A23A0196

09-15-2022

JONATHAN MICHAEL STONE v. THE STATE.


The trial court entered an order denying Jonathan Michael Stone's special demurrer to the indictment. Stone then filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

The dismissal of Stone's special demurrer must be appealed in accordance with the interlocutory appeal procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b) - including obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Ivey v. State, 210 Ga.App. 782, 783 (437 S.E.2d 810) (1993) (appeal of order overruling special demurrer required compliance with interlocutory appeal procedure). Stone's failure to follow the proper appellate procedures deprives us of jurisdiction.

In his notice of appeal, Stone asserts that he is appealing the trial court's order under the collateral order doctrine. "The collateral order doctrine permits appeals from a small category of decisions that are (i) conclusive, (ii) that resolve important questions separate from the merits, and (iii) that are effectively unreviewable on appeal from the final judgment in the underlying action." Expedia, Inc. v. City of Columbus, 305 Ga.App. 450, 452 (1) (699 S.E.2d 600) (2010) (punctuation omitted). This narrow doctrine applies only to those cases in which denial of immediate appeal would render appellate review impossible. See Murphy v. Murphy, 322 Ga.App. 829, 831 (747 S.E.2d 21) (2013). That is not the case here and thus, the collateral order doctrine does not apply.

Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Stone v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 15, 2022
No. A23A0196 (Ga. Ct. App. Sep. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Stone v. State

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN MICHAEL STONE v. THE STATE.

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 15, 2022

Citations

No. A23A0196 (Ga. Ct. App. Sep. 15, 2022)