From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stone v. K Clark Prop. Mgmt.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Oct 4, 2022
No. 04-22-00454-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 4, 2022)

Opinion

04-22-00454-CV

10-04-2022

Billie O. STONE d/b/a Stobil Enterprises, Appellant v. K CLARK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC and Trans Ventura, LLC Series B,Appellees


From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022CI03480 Honorable H. Paul Canales, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice.

Appellant seeks to appeal from the trial court's summary judgment order signed on July 1, 2022. On September 30, 2022, the trial court clerk filed the clerk's record. After reviewing the record, we cannot determine whether the summary judgment order is a final, appealable order.

An order granting summary judgment is not final for purposes of appeal "unless it actually disposes of every pending claim and party or unless it clearly and unequivocally states that it finally disposes of all claims and all parties." Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 205 (Tex. 2001). Here, the trial court's order does not unequivocally state that it finally disposes of all claims and parties, and it is unclear from the order and the record whether appellees' request for attorney's fees remains pending. Appellees requested attorney's fees in their answer and in their motion for summary judgment. The trial court's order states that appellees' motion for summary judgment is granted in its entirety; however, the order does not award attorney's fees. See Farm Bureau Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Rogers, 455 S.W.3d 161, 164 (Tex. 2015) (holding trial court's summary judgment order did not dispose of parties' requests for attorney's fees); see also In re Educap, Inc., No. 01-12-00546-CV., 2012 WL 3224110, at *2 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2012, no pet.) (determining trial court did not render final judgment when judgment failed to address claim for attorney's fee, which was expressly asserted in party's answer and motion for summary judgment).

Accordingly, we sua sponte ABATE this appeal and ORDER the trial court to clarify whether it intended to render a final judgment and, if so, to sign a judgment that is final for 1 purposes of appeal. See Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 206 ("If the appellate court is uncertain about the intent of the order, it can abate the appeal to permit clarification by the trial court.").

We further ORDER the trial court to cause a supplemental clerk's record containing any pleadings, orders, and judgment relating to this order to be filed in this court by November 3, 2022. All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court. 2


Summaries of

Stone v. K Clark Prop. Mgmt.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Oct 4, 2022
No. 04-22-00454-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 4, 2022)
Case details for

Stone v. K Clark Prop. Mgmt.

Case Details

Full title:Billie O. STONE d/b/a Stobil Enterprises, Appellant v. K CLARK PROPERTY…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Oct 4, 2022

Citations

No. 04-22-00454-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 4, 2022)