From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stokes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 18, 2009
3 So. 3d 425 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Summary

noting that a circuit court of the county in which a defendant is incarcerated has jurisdiction to consider a petition for writ of habeas corpus when the claims raised in the petition concern issues regarding his incarceration but not when the claims attack the validity of the judgment and sentence

Summary of this case from Torres v. State

Opinion

No. 3D08-2109.

February 18, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Miami-Dade County, Spencer Eig, J.

Anthony J. Stokes, in proper person.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Lunar Claire Alvey, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before WELLS, SHEPHERD, and SUAREZ, JJ.


Anthony J. Stokes appeals a final order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Because we find that the Eleventh Judicial Circuit lacked jurisdiction to consider the claim raised in Stokes' habeas petition, we affirm the denial without prejudice for Stokes to seek appropriate relief in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit.

As this Court explained in Brinson v. State, 988 So.2d 665, 665-66 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (quoting Broom v. State, 907 So.2d 1261, 1262 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)) (citations omitted):

The circuit court of the county in which a defendant is incarcerated has jurisdiction to consider a petition for writ of habeas corpus when the claims raised in the petition concern issues regarding his incarceration, but not when the claims attack the validity of the judgment or sentence. Only the court in which the defendant was convicted and sentenced has jurisdiction to consider collateral attacks on a judgment or sentence, and such an attack must be brought pursuant to Rule 3.800 or 3.850, not by petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Because Stokes challenges his conviction and not the conditions of his imprisonment, we affirm the trial court's order without prejudice. "Post-conviction challenges must be pursued in the circuit court where the conviction was obtained." Brinson, 988 So.2d at 666. Any challenge by Stokes to his conviction or sentence pursuant to Rule 3.800 or Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, should be brought in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, where Stokes was convicted and sentenced.

Affirmed without prejudice.


Summaries of

Stokes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 18, 2009
3 So. 3d 425 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

noting that a circuit court of the county in which a defendant is incarcerated has jurisdiction to consider a petition for writ of habeas corpus when the claims raised in the petition concern issues regarding his incarceration but not when the claims attack the validity of the judgment and sentence

Summary of this case from Torres v. State
Case details for

Stokes v. State

Case Details

Full title:Anthony J. STOKES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 18, 2009

Citations

3 So. 3d 425 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Citing Cases

Torres v. State

Appellant, Jose A. Torres, Sr., appeals an order transferring his petition for writ of habeas corpus from the…

Taylor v. Dep't of Corr.

AFFIRMED, without prejudice to Taylor seeking relief in Bay County. See Stokes v. State, 3 So.3d 425, 425–26…