From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stokes v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Apr 13, 2007
477 Mich. 1097 (Mich. 2007)

Opinion

No. 132648.

April 13, 2007.

Appeal from the Reported below: 272 Mich App 571.


Orders Granting Oral Argument in Cases Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal April 13, 2007.

The motions for leave to file a brief amicus curiae are granted. The application for leave to appeal the October 26, 2006, judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether the burden-shifting analysis described in the Court of Appeals opinion in this case relieved the plaintiff of the burden of proving that he was disabled from all jobs within his qualifications and training, as required by Sington v Chrysler Corp, 467 Mich 144 (2002). The parties shall file supplemental briefs addressing this issue within 56 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of the arguments made in their application papers.


Summaries of

Stokes v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Apr 13, 2007
477 Mich. 1097 (Mich. 2007)
Case details for

Stokes v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Case Details

Full title:FREDIE STOKES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Apr 13, 2007

Citations

477 Mich. 1097 (Mich. 2007)
729 N.W.2d 511