From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stoker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 4, 1984
449 So. 2d 408 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-762.

May 4, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lee County, R. Wallace Pack, J.

Jerry Hill, Public Defender, and Paul C. Helm, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James H. Dysart, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Defendant was convicted and sentenced for robbery with a weapon, in violation of section 812.13(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1981), and grand theft, in violation of section 812.014(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1981). Defendant raises three points on appeal. We find no merit in defendant's first contention that photograph lineup identification procedures were improperly conducted. As to defendant's second point, we find no double jeopardy in his convictions.

We agree with defendant's last point and strike that portion of his sentence which requires him to pay restitution as a condition of parole. See Brown v. State, 427 So.2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Alexander v. State, 425 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

GRIMES, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stoker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 4, 1984
449 So. 2d 408 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Stoker v. State

Case Details

Full title:DENNIE LEE STOKER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 4, 1984

Citations

449 So. 2d 408 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Shivers v. State

See Rodriquez v. State, 443 So.2d 236 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), review granted, No. 64,775 ( State v. Rodriquez),…