From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stockton v. Dougherty

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Mar 26, 2014
88 A.3d 968 (Pa. 2014)

Opinion

2014-03-26

Ronald STOCKTON, Appellant v. Francis M. DOUGHERTY, et al., Appellees.

No. 44 EAP 2012, Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court dated July 10, 2012 at No. 31 M.D.2011. Ronald Stockton, Huntingdon, PA, pro se. Kelly Susan Diffily, City of Philadelphia Law Department, Philadelphia, for Clerk of Courts of Philadelphia County.


No. 44 EAP 2012, Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court dated July 10, 2012 at No. 31 M.D.2011.
Ronald Stockton, Huntingdon, PA, pro se. Kelly Susan Diffily, City of Philadelphia Law Department, Philadelphia, for Clerk of Courts of Philadelphia County.
Suzanne Noelle Hueston, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Mechanicsburg, for P.A. Davis, Jane Doe, John Doe, Francis M. Dougherty, Marikosa Lamas, Beatrice Rivello, Dorina Varner.

Travis Scott Anderson, PA Department of Corrections, Mechanicsburg, for P.A. Davis, Francis M. Dougherty, Marikosa Lamas, Beatrice Rivello, Dorina Varner.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2014, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby AFFIRMED. The Clerk of Courts' “Motion to File Supplemental Brief” is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Stockton v. Dougherty

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Mar 26, 2014
88 A.3d 968 (Pa. 2014)
Case details for

Stockton v. Dougherty

Case Details

Full title:Ronald STOCKTON, Appellant v. Francis M. DOUGHERTY, et al., Appellees.

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Mar 26, 2014

Citations

88 A.3d 968 (Pa. 2014)