From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stockdale v. State

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 17, 1981
431 N.E.2d 975 (N.Y. 1981)

Opinion

Decided December 17, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, FRANK S. ROSSETTI, J.

Herman E. Gottfried and Vincent A. De Iorio for appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( Dennis Hurley of counsel), for respondent.


On summary consideration, order reversed, with costs, and the judgment of the Court of Claims reinstated. The findings made by the Court of Claims regarding value were supported by evidence in the record and adequately explained (see Matter of City of New York [ A W Realty Corp.], 1 N.Y.2d 428) and affirmed by the Appellate Division. The value assigned to the remaining buildings upon the subject property before the partial appropriation and the value thereafter were within the range of the expert testimony and yielded, upon calculation, a total of $10,000 in consequential damages. The Appellate Division thus erred, as a matter of law, in holding that there was no range of evidence on this element of damages.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Stockdale v. State

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 17, 1981
431 N.E.2d 975 (N.Y. 1981)
Case details for

Stockdale v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN D. STOCKDALE, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Claim No…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 17, 1981

Citations

431 N.E.2d 975 (N.Y. 1981)
431 N.E.2d 975
447 N.Y.S.2d 249

Citing Cases

Townhomes of Millbrooke, Inc. v. State

Its finding was based upon the evidence of before and after values given by the two appraisers after it…

Rider v. State

The Court of Claims' finding that the remaining access was unsuitable is supported by evidence in the record…