From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Sternberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 1986
120 A.D.2d 661 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

May 19, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Velsor, J.).


Order affirmed, with costs.

The record contains no evidence that the action for specific performance has been commenced or prosecuted in bad faith (cf., CPLR 6514 [b]), and given a court's limited scope of review on a motion such as this (see, 5303 Realty Corp. v O Y Equity Corp., 64 N.Y.2d 313, 319-321), Special Term did not abuse its discretion in refusing to cancel the notice of pendency. Mollen, P.J., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Sternberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 1986
120 A.D.2d 661 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Stewart v. Sternberg

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM M. STEWART et al., Respondents, et al., Plaintiff, v. MARTIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 19, 1986

Citations

120 A.D.2d 661 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Sealy v. Clifton LLC

Pursuant to CPLR 6514(b), the court may cancel a notice of pendency if the procedures prescribed in Article…