From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Dec 2, 2004
199 S.W.3d 78 (Ark. 2004)

Opinion

No. CR 04-1199.

Opinion delivered December 2, 2004.

APPEAL ERROR — MOTION FOR BELATED APPEAL — MATTER REMANDED TO SETTLE RECORD. — Where there existed a dispute as to whether appellant had informed his trial counsel that he wanted to appeal his conviction, the matter was remanded to the trial court to determine whether appellant had actually requested his trial attorney to file a notice of appeal on his behalf; however, because both the trial attorney and appellant's present attorney worked for the public defender, it was not necessary for the trial court to settle the record as to which attorney was the attorney of record on appeal; the parties were granted thirty days from the date of the order to settle this issue; once the supreme court receives the trial court's findings, it will then take up the motion for belated appeal.

Motion for Belated Appeal; remanded to settle record.

Clint Miller, for appellant.

No response.


Appellant Gary Lee Stewart, by and through his attorney Clint Miller, Deputy Public Defender, has filed a motion for belated appeal. The motion reflects that Appellant was convicted in the Pulaski County Circuit Court of one count of possession of a controlled substance, two counts of first-degree terroristic threatening, and one count of carrying a weapon. The judgment and commitment orders were entered on September 7, 2004.

During the proceedings below, Appellant was represented by Deputy Public Defender Lance Sullenberger. Mr. Sullenberger did not file a notice of appeal on Appellant's behalf. The motion now before us reflects that there is a dispute as to whether Appellant informed Mr. Sullenberger that he wanted to appeal his convictions. Appellant thus asks us to remand this matter to the trial court to settle the record.

[1] Pursuant to our holdings in Kuelper v. State, 355 Ark. 539, 140 S.W.3d 464 (2004) ( per curiam), and Venis v. State, 350 Ark. 110, 84 S.W.3d 867 (2002) ( per curiam), we remand this matter to the trial court to determine whether Appellant actually requested his trial attorney, Mr. Sullenberger, to file a notice of appeal on his behalf. However, because both Mr. Sullenberger and Mr. Miller work for the Pulaski County Public Defender, it is not necessary for the trial court to settle the record as to which attorney is the attorney of record on appeal. We grant the parties thirty days from the date of this per curiam order to settle this issue. Once we receive the trial court's findings, we will then take up the motion for belated appeal.

It is so ordered.

APPENDIX Rules Adopted or Amended by Per Curiam Orders


Summaries of

Stewart v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Dec 2, 2004
199 S.W.3d 78 (Ark. 2004)
Case details for

Stewart v. State

Case Details

Full title:Gary Lee STEWART v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 2, 2004

Citations

199 S.W.3d 78 (Ark. 2004)
199 S.W.3d 78

Citing Cases

Stewart v. State

We initially remanded the matter to the trial court to determine if Appellant had in fact informed his…