From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 29, 1993
864 P.2d 880 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

87-939; CA A73828

Argued and submitted November 23, 1993.

Affirmed December 29, 1993.

Judicial Review from Psychiatric Security Review Board.

Harris S. Matarazzo argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Katherine H. Waldo, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and Edmonds, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Petitioner seeks review of a February 24, 1992, Psychiatric Security Review Board order denying him conditional release. We affirm.

Petitioner was released on March 11, 1992, about two weeks after the order was entered. He points to no collateral consequences at this time resulting from his continued confinement after the February, 1992, order. His petition is moot. See Brumnett v. PSRB, 315 Or. 402, 848 P.2d 1194 (1993).

We expressly do not decide petitioner's claim that his condition does not constitute a mental disease.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 29, 1993
864 P.2d 880 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Stewart v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

Case Details

Full title:DAVID EUGENE STEWART, Petitioner, v. PSYCHIATRIC SECURITY REVIEW BOARD…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 29, 1993

Citations

864 P.2d 880 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
864 P.2d 880

Citing Cases

Jones v. Thompson

r available); Yeon Street Partners v. Environmental Consulting, 112 Or. App. 251, 255, 828 P.2d 477 (1992)…