From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Commercial Vehicles

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Feb 16, 2010
366 F. App'x 41 (11th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-13889 Non-Argument Calendar.

February 16, 2010.

G. Ware Cornell, Jr., Cornell Associates, P.A., Weston, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Tammie Leigh Rattray, Ford Harrison, LLP, Tampa, FL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. D.C. Docket No. 08-00393-CV-T-23EAJ.

Before BLACK, PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges.


Jesse Raymond Stewart filed this civil action asserting federal claims in Count One and a state-law claim in Count Two. The district court granted the Defendants summary judgment on the federal claims in Count One, and for that reason declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claim in Count Two. At issue on this appeal is the propriety of the grant of summary judgment on the federal claims in Count One.

Count One of the Amended Complaint (R.35) alleges that the Defendants conspired "to remove STEWART from servicing OAKLEY TRANSPORT and other customers of FREIGHTLINER OF TAMPA on account of his race" ( Id. at 8.)

Count One's conspiracy claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) asserted: (1) violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981; (2) violation of the Thirteenth Amendment; and (3) violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Only the first two are at issue on this appeal. The district court concluded that § 1985(3) creates no rights, and that a § 1985(3) claim cannot be based upon a deprivation of rights guaranteed by § 1981(a). (R.80 at 5-6.) We agree. And, the district court found that the Plaintiff alleges no facts supporting the claim that the Defendants infringed the Plaintiff's Thirteenth Amendment right to be free from involuntary servitude. ( Id. at 6-7.) We find no error in that conclusion.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Commercial Vehicles

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Feb 16, 2010
366 F. App'x 41 (11th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Stewart v. Commercial Vehicles

Case Details

Full title:Jesse Raymond STEWART, "Ray", Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMERCIAL VEHICLES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Feb 16, 2010

Citations

366 F. App'x 41 (11th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Young v. Owens

Plaintiffs' claims are vague and conclusory. In any event, Defendants' arguments are unopposed that a civil…

Young v. Owens

Moreover, plaintiffs offer no response to the defense argument that a civil conspiracy claim brought pursuant…