From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stevens v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 17, 1995
651 So. 2d 831 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-2157.

March 17, 1995.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County. E. Vernon Douglas, Judge.

Glen P. Gifford, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Sonya Roebuck Horbelt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


We have for review the judgment and sentence imposing adult sanction on Ricky A. Stevens (Stevens) for a series of burglaries. The State correctly concedes that the trial judge's written order imposing adult sanctions was not entered contemporaneously with the judge's oral pronouncement of Stevens' sentence. Resentencing therefore is required; the judge again may impose adult sanctions. Troutman v. State, 630 So.2d 528 (Fla. 1993).

The judge's written order is at variance with his oral pronouncement. Stevens' sentence, on remand, must confirm to the oral pronouncement of sentence. Farnam v. State, 516 So.2d 329 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.

BOOTH, LAWRENCE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stevens v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 17, 1995
651 So. 2d 831 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Stevens v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICKY A. STEVENS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 17, 1995

Citations

651 So. 2d 831 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

State v. Bock

Inexplicably, however, the trial judge's written order reflects a different conclusion regarding the…

Nieves v. State

A defendant's sentence must conform to the oral pronouncement of the sentence. See Amador v. State, 713 So.2d…