From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sternheim v. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 7, 2001
283 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted April 11, 2001.

May 7, 2001

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), entered July 20, 2000, which directed its project manager to be deposed and its counsel to provide additional records to the third-party defendant, and (2), as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the same court, entered October 24, 2000, as denied its cross motion to disqualify Brody, Fabiani Cohen as counsel for the third-party defendant.

Jeffrey Samel, New York, N.Y., for defendant third-party plaintiff-appellant.

Brody, Fabiani Cohen, New York, N.Y. (Stephen M. Cohen and Christopher J. Crawford of counsel), for third-party defendant-respondent.

Before: RITTER, J.P., ALTMAN, McGINITY, SMITH and COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the order entered July 20, 2000, is affirmed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the order entered October 24, 2000, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

ORDERED that the third-party defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in directing additional discovery (see, Schobel v. Godwin, 264 A.D.2d 832).

Additionally, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion of the defendant third-party plaintiff to disqualify the law firm retained by the third-party defendant (see, Mintz v. Mintz, 261 A.D.2d 455).


Summaries of

Sternheim v. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 7, 2001
283 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Sternheim v. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel

Case Details

Full title:ISAAC STERNHEIM, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE AND TUNNEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 7, 2001

Citations

283 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
723 N.Y.S.2d 869

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. Savoy Boro Park Associates Ltd. Partnership

The merits of that argument, which addresses rights separate and apart from those asserted against Halpern…