From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sterling v. Town of Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 26, 1999
260 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 26, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Franco, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The defendants failed to establish their entitlement to judgment in their favor as a matter of law, and were not entitled to summary judgment based solely on claimed deficiencies in the plaintiff's proof ( see, Porter v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 224 A.D.2d 674).

S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sterling v. Town of Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 26, 1999
260 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Sterling v. Town of Hempstead

Case Details

Full title:JOHN STERLING, Respondent, v. TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD et al, Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 26, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
687 N.Y.S.2d 276

Citing Cases

Silverman v. Sciartelli

Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting defendants' motions seeking summary judgment dismissing the…

Hicks v. City of Buffalo

The court erred, however, in granting defendants' cross motion insofar as it sought summary judgment…