From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stephens v. Globe Register Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Mar 6, 1934
30 P.2d 170 (Okla. 1934)

Opinion

No. 24967

March 6, 1934.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal, and Error — Dismissal — Appeal not Filed Within Legal Time.

Where a proceeding in error is not filed in this court until after the expiration of six months from the date of the order or judgment appealed from, it will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Appeal from District Court, Pittsburg County; Enloe V. Vernor, Judge.

Action by the Globe Register Company against Mary Stephens and others for possession of real estate. From a judgment for the plaintiff, defendants appeal. Dismissed.

Twine Twine, for plaintiffs in error.

Horton Horton, for defendant in error.


This action was begun in the district court of Pittsburg county on the 19th day of September, 1932, and after a final judgment by the court below a motion for new trial was filed and duly overruled on the 11th day of February, 1933.

The appeal was not filed in this court until the 19th day of August, 1933, which is more than six months subsequent to the date of the order overruling motion for new trial, the last and final order entered by the court. Under the universal holdings of this court, it is without jurisdiction to review a proceeding in error not commenced within six months after the final order appealed from. Johnston v. Carey, Lombard, Young Co., 163 Okla. 197, 23 P.2d 188; Morrison v. Swink, 128 Okla. 97, 261 P. 209; Wheete v. City of Tulsa, 98 Okla. 4, 223 P. 634; Ginn v. Knight, 106 Okla. 4, 232 P. 936; In re Guardianship of Baptiste, 125 Okla. 184, 256 P. 520. The appeal is therefore dismissed.


Summaries of

Stephens v. Globe Register Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Mar 6, 1934
30 P.2d 170 (Okla. 1934)
Case details for

Stephens v. Globe Register Co.

Case Details

Full title:STEPHENS et al. v. GLOBE REGISTER CO

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Mar 6, 1934

Citations

30 P.2d 170 (Okla. 1934)
30 P.2d 170

Citing Cases

Dickenson v. Selby

The motion is uncontested. This court had repeatedly held that where an appeal is not taken within six months…