Summary
dismissing Section 2241 petition where sentence computation claim was considered and denied on the merits in a previously-filed habeas petition
Summary of this case from Ingram v. HemingwayOpinion
No. 13-7269
01-23-2014
NATHAN LEON STEPHENS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN A. DUNBAR, Respondent - Appellee.
Nathan Leon Stephens, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Bredenberg, FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:12-hc-02035-FL) Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nathan Leon Stephens, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Bredenberg, FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Nathan Leon Stephens, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stephens v. Dunbar, No. 5:12-hc-02035-FL (E.D.N.C. July 29, 2013) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED