From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steinman v. Olafson

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Dec 22, 1955
1 Misc. 2d 50 (N.Y. App. Term 1955)

Opinion

December 22, 1955

Appeal from the District Court of the County of Nassau, First District, JOHN DALY, J.

George H. Hamilton for appellant.

William J. Dalton for respondent.


No time of performance having been fixed in the contract, a reasonable time for performance is implied ( Murray Co. v. Lidgerwood Mfg. Co., 241 N.Y. 455). What was a reasonable time would depend upon the existing facts and circumstances. It was, therefore, error not to allow defendant to testify to conversations had with plaintiff before the agreement was signed, not for the purpose of varying the terms of the writing, but to show what the situation was when the agreement was signed in order that it might be determined what was a reasonable time for performance on the part of plaintiff. It was also error to exclude the testimony of defendant's attorney as to conversations had with plaintiff.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, and a new trial granted, with $30 costs to defendant to abide the event.

KLEINFELD, PETTE and DI GIOVANNA, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Steinman v. Olafson

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Dec 22, 1955
1 Misc. 2d 50 (N.Y. App. Term 1955)
Case details for

Steinman v. Olafson

Case Details

Full title:MURRAY STEINMAN, Respondent, v. THOR OLAFSON, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1955

Citations

1 Misc. 2d 50 (N.Y. App. Term 1955)
149 N.Y.S.2d 31

Citing Cases

Popovich v. Sony Music

Part of the duty of good faith is an obligation to perform in a timely manner. Steinman v. Olafson, 1 Misc.2d…

Locke v. Nathanson

Plaintiff's testimony that the repairs were to be completed before the commencement of the term varied the…