Steinberg v. Marlin

Full title: Paul STEINBERG, Appellant, v. Robyn MARLIN, et al., Appellees.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Jul 21, 2021

321 So. 3d 389 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 3D20-1873

07-21-2021

Paul STEINBERG, Appellant, v. Robyn MARLIN, et al., Appellees.

Scott Jay Feder, P.A., and Scott Jay Feder, for appellant. Bruce S. Rogow, P.A., Bruce S. Rogow, and Tara A. Campion (Cedar Mountain, NC), for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Scott Jay Feder, P.A., and Scott Jay Feder, for appellant.

Bruce S. Rogow, P.A., Bruce S. Rogow, and Tara A. Campion (Cedar Mountain, NC), for appellees.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and GORDO, and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ; Zarate v. Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co., 81 So. 3d 556, 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) ("Where there is no record of the testimony of witnesses or of evidentiary rulings, and where a statement of the record has not been prepared pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(a)(3) or (b)(3), a judgment which is not fundamentally erroneous on its face must be affirmed.").