From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steinberg v. Landair Associated Corp., Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 1, 1950
10 F.R.D. 447 (S.D.N.Y. 1950)

Opinion

Action by Rose L. Steinberg, a stockholder of the Equity Corporation, suing on behalf of herself and all other stockholders similarly situated and on behalf of and in the right of the Equity Corporation, against Landair Associated Corporation, Inc., Oceanic Trading Company, Inc., and another, wherein second-named defendant moved to quash process. The District Court, Medina, J., held that determination of question whether individual served was agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process for such defendant, could not be made without information concerning the amount and character of business, if any, transacted by such defendant within the jurisdiction of this court at or about the time of the purported service of process, and therefore court appointed a special master to take evidence on all the issues involved on the motion and to report thereon to the court.

Order in accordance with opinion.

Morris J. Levy, New York City, for plaintiff.

Beekman & Bogue, New York City (Edward K. Hanlon, Walter E. Beverly, Jr., New York City, of counsel), for defendants.


MEDINA, District Judge.

It appears to be established by the affidavits submitted in support of this motion that Ralph E. Still was not an officer or director of defendant Oceanic Trading Co., Inc., at the time of the delivery to him of copies of the summons and complaint. But the determination of the further question of whether he was ‘ a managing or general agent’ or ‘ any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process', Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 4(d)(3) 28 U.S.C.A., cannot be made without information concerning the amount and character of the business, if any, transacted by said defendant within the jurisdiction of this Court at or about the time of the purported service of process. The record before me is not sufficiently clear and comprehensive to justify either the granting or the denial of the motion. Accordingly, I hereby designate Julian J. Appleton of 165 Broadway, New York, N.Y., as Special Master to take evidence on all the issues involved on this motion and to report thereon to the Court.

Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Steinberg v. Landair Associated Corp., Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 1, 1950
10 F.R.D. 447 (S.D.N.Y. 1950)
Case details for

Steinberg v. Landair Associated Corp., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:STEINBERG v. LANDAIR ASSOCIATED CORPORATION, Inc., et al.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 1, 1950

Citations

10 F.R.D. 447 (S.D.N.Y. 1950)

Citing Cases

Skinner v. Aluminum Co. of America

There are many cases since the adoption of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Arrow Distilleries…

Blackhawk Heating & Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Turner

We could refer this matter to a special master to take evidence. Neuburg Sales Serv. v. Mitchell Mfg. Co.,…