From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stein v. Pat Noto, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1996
226 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 22, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff was injured when his vehicle left a paved roadway and collided with a construction site maintained by the defendant. The plaintiff has failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant violated 17 N.Y.CRR former 131.17 (c) (2) and (d) (1) (ii). In addition, the defendant unquestionably established that the proximate cause of the accident was the plaintiff's loss of control of his vehicle, and that the construction site merely furnished the condition for the occurrence, not the cause ( see, Margolin v. Friedman, 43 N.Y.2d 982; Rivera v. Goldstein, 152 A.D.2d 556). Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stein v. Pat Noto, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1996
226 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Stein v. Pat Noto, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD E. STEIN, Appellant, v. PAT NOTO, INC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 22, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
641 N.Y.S.2d 353

Citing Cases

Kirtoglou v. Fogarty

These issues are not before this Court and not essential to our holding that defendant's placement of the…

Gregory v. Cavarello

In Cavarello's sworn statement to the police, he stated that there were "2 buses coming" in the opposite lane…