From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stegall v. Res. Tech. Corp.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Nov 29, 2021
966 N.W.2d 354 (Mich. 2021)

Opinion

SC: 160495 COA: 341197

11-29-2021

Cleveland STEGALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RESOURCE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, d/b/a Brightwing, and FCA US, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 24, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief addressing whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the appellees were entitled to summary disposition of the appellant's claim that he was discharged in violation of public policy. The appellant's brief shall be filed by February 28, 2022, with no extensions except upon a showing of good cause. In the brief, citations to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellees shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant's brief. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant within 14 days of being served with the appellees’ brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

The total time allowed for oral argument shall be 40 minutes: 20 minutes for the appellant, and 20 minutes for the appellees, to be divided at their discretion. MCR 7.314(B)(2).


Summaries of

Stegall v. Res. Tech. Corp.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Nov 29, 2021
966 N.W.2d 354 (Mich. 2021)
Case details for

Stegall v. Res. Tech. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Cleveland STEGALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RESOURCE TECHNOLOGY…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Nov 29, 2021

Citations

966 N.W.2d 354 (Mich. 2021)

Citing Cases

Stegall v. Res. Tech. Corp.

But in our order directing supplemental briefing, the parties were instructed to address "whether the Court…