From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stefatos v. Frezza

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 31, 2012
95 A.D.3d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-05-31

John STEFATOS, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. John FREZZA, et al., Defendants–Respondents, John and Jane Does, etc., et al., Defendants.

Joanne Cassidy, Bronx, for appellants. Welby, Brady & Greenblatt, LLP, White Plains (Geoffrey S. Pope of counsel), for respondents.



Joanne Cassidy, Bronx, for appellants. Welby, Brady & Greenblatt, LLP, White Plains (Geoffrey S. Pope of counsel), for respondents.
TOM, J.P., ANDRIAS, SAXE, MOSKOWITZ, ACOSTA, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard J. Fried, J.), entered January 5, 2011, which granted defendants John Frezza, Fred–Doug Manager, LLC, Fred–Doug 117, LLC, Strategic Construction Corp., Strategic Construction, Ltd., Strategic Land Co., Inc. and Strategic Development Group, Inc.'s motion to dismiss the complaint except for the breach of contract cause of action as against Fred–Doug 117, LLC, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs offer no substantive arguments in their opening brief regarding their declaratory judgment, accounting, conversion, malevolent indifference, appointment of a receiver, equitable lien, or constructive trust claims, and thus have abandoned those claims ( see Edelman v. Emigrant Bank Fine Art. Fin., LLC, 89 A.D.3d 632, 632–633, 933 N.Y.S.2d 270 [2011];see also Cassidy v. Highrise Hoisting & Scaffolding, Inc., 89 A.D.3d 510, 932 N.Y.S.2d 456 [2011] [argument raised for the first time in reply not considered] ).

The breach of contract claim that was dismissed is barred by the six-year statute of limitations (CPLR 213[2] ), since the last of the projects at issue was completed by 2003 and plaintiffs did not commence this action until 2010. The fraud and misrepresentation and breach of fiduciary duty claims are duplicative of the breach of contract claim ( see Financial Structures Ltd. v. UBS AG, 77 A.D.3d 417, 419, 909 N.Y.S.2d 45 [2010];CMMF, LLC v. J.P. Morgan Inv. Mgt. Inc., 78 A.D.3d 562, 564–565, 915 N.Y.S.2d 2 [2010] ).

We have considered plaintiffs' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Stefatos v. Frezza

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 31, 2012
95 A.D.3d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Stefatos v. Frezza

Case Details

Full title:John STEFATOS, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. John FREZZA, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 31, 2012

Citations

95 A.D.3d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
945 N.Y.S.2d 297
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 4229

Citing Cases

Portfolio v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n

To the extent that the breach of fiduciary duty and breach of “extra-contractual duties” claims are…

Nemeth v. Brenntag N. Am.

The trial judge found that Dr. Moolgavkar did not possess the professional qualifications to render this…