From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steele v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Nov 12, 1923
219 P. 429 (Okla. Crim. App. 1923)

Summary

In Steele v. State, 25 Okla. Cr. 226, 219 P. 429, this court dismissed this appeal for the reason that the petition in error and case-made were not filed within 60 days from judgment, and no order extending the time appeared in the record.

Summary of this case from Steele v. State

Opinion

No. A-4292.

Opinion Filed November 12, 1923.

Appeal from County Court, Major County; Harry Randall, Judge.

Jessie Steele was convicted of the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquors, and she appeals. Appeal dismissed.

John V. Roberts, for plaintiff in error.

The Attorney General, for the State.


This is an appeal from the county court of Major county, wherein, on the 15th day of December, 1921, plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and sentenced as above indicated. Petition in error and case-made were filed in this court on April 12, 1922, 118 days after the rendition of the judgment. No order of the trial court appears of record extending the time to take the appeal beyond the 60 days allowed by statute in misdemeanor cases. Unless such extension is made by the trial court this court acquires no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Danna v. State, 16 Okla. Cr. 114, 180 P. 869; Krivanek v. State, 11 Okla. Cr. 172, 144 P. 188.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Steele v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Nov 12, 1923
219 P. 429 (Okla. Crim. App. 1923)

In Steele v. State, 25 Okla. Cr. 226, 219 P. 429, this court dismissed this appeal for the reason that the petition in error and case-made were not filed within 60 days from judgment, and no order extending the time appeared in the record.

Summary of this case from Steele v. State
Case details for

Steele v. State

Case Details

Full title:JESSIE STEELE v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Nov 12, 1923

Citations

219 P. 429 (Okla. Crim. App. 1923)
219 P. 429

Citing Cases

West v. Hapgood; West v. Edwards

The rule is subject to the qualification that although a trust is not permitted to delegate a discretionary…

Wallace v. Tulsa

" This statute has been construed by this court many times, and it has been the universal holding that when…