From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steele v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 20, 1994
634 So. 2d 827 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-3812.

April 20, 1994.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County; Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Judge.

Ernest M. Steele, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's motion for post-conviction relief. On the issue of counsel's alleged "promise" as to appellant's eligibility for gain time, the record reflects appellant's acknowledgment at his plea hearing that no "promises," other than those referred to at the plea hearing, had been made to him by anyone. This is sufficient to support a denial of his claim. See Zaetler v. State, 627 So.2d 1328 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Steele v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 20, 1994
634 So. 2d 827 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Steele v. State

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST M. STEELE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 20, 1994

Citations

634 So. 2d 827 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)