From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steele v. Grubbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
May 25, 2016
CIVIL CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-1117-M-BK (N.D. Tex. May. 25, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-1117-M-BK

05-25-2016

TOMMY W. STEELE, #4227-15 Plaintiff, v. JOE GRUBBS, Retired District Attorney, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is summarily DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous until such time as Plaintiff satisfies the conditions set forth in Heck v. Humphrey. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). This dismissal will count as a "strike" or "prior occasion" within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

The Court prospectively CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(3). In support of this certification, the Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 and n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the Findings and Recommendation, the Court finds that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). In the event of an appeal, Plaintiff may challenge this certification by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal with the Clerk of the Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202; FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(5).

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) governs the time to appeal an order. A timely notice of appeal must be filed even if the district court certifies an appeal as not taken in good faith. --------

SO ORDERED this 25 day of May, 2016.

/s/ _________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

CHIEF JUDGE


Summaries of

Steele v. Grubbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
May 25, 2016
CIVIL CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-1117-M-BK (N.D. Tex. May. 25, 2016)
Case details for

Steele v. Grubbs

Case Details

Full title:TOMMY W. STEELE, #4227-15 Plaintiff, v. JOE GRUBBS, Retired District…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: May 25, 2016

Citations

CIVIL CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-1117-M-BK (N.D. Tex. May. 25, 2016)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Trinity Oil & Gas Co.

"[A] pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal…

Chyba v. SLS

"[A] pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal…