From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stebbins v. Friend, Crosby Company

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Feb 19, 1932
241 N.W. 315 (Minn. 1932)

Opinion

Nos. 28,687, 28,688.

February 19, 1932.

Judgment — operation and effect of satisfaction.

By stipulating for the satisfaction of two judgments and discharging them of record upon payment of the principal sum due and all costs, except a fee of one dollar charged upon writs of execution outstanding under which no levy had been made, the judgment creditor waived payment of that item.

Certiorari upon the relation of plaintiffs to review orders of the district court for Dakota county, Schultz, J. granting defendant's motion to strike plaintiffs' causes of action from the calendar. Orders striking cases from calendar reversed.

Oppenheimer, Dickson, Hodgson, Brown Donnelly, for relators.

E.E. Eder, for respondent.



Two cases, heard together here, appear for the third time in this court notwithstanding that they have not yet been tried, a situation chargeable almost if not entirely to counsel rather than the court below. The two earlier decisions appear in 178 Minn. 549, 228 N.W. 150, and 184 Minn. 177, 238 N.W. 57. By the latter decision we denied defendant's motion to quash writs of certiorari upon the hearing of which the cases are again presented. The writs bring up orders of the trial court striking the cases from the calendar, upon the ground of plaintiffs' supposed noncompliance with an earlier order conditionally requiring them to pay defendant's attorney "the full amount of the balance due on the execution issued" on the judgments referred to in our last opinion. The two judgments have been paid in full except for an item of two dollars and interest thereon, arising from a charge of a fee of one dollar on each of the two executions issued. (No levy appears to have been made.) But the judgments were satisfied pursuant to stipulation of counsel. They were discharged of record, and that ended all further obligation of plaintiffs as judgment debtors. The terms imposed were for the benefit of defendant. It was within its power to waive them or any part of them. It appears conclusively, we think, that it waived payment of the paltry two dollars in question. In any event, the executions were made exactly nothing by the satisfaction of the judgments. They thereby became and now remain without force or effect of any kind.

The orders striking the cases from the calendar must be reversed. No statutory costs will be allowed.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Stebbins v. Friend, Crosby Company

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Feb 19, 1932
241 N.W. 315 (Minn. 1932)
Case details for

Stebbins v. Friend, Crosby Company

Case Details

Full title:ROY STEBBINS v. FRIEND, CROSBY COMPANY. FRANK KROM v. SAME DEFENDANT

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Feb 19, 1932

Citations

241 N.W. 315 (Minn. 1932)
241 N.W. 315