From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stayrook v. Masse

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
May 24, 2012
Case No. 11-cv-426-SM (D.N.H. May. 24, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 11-cv-426-SM

05-24-2012

Shawn Stayrook v. FNU Masse, et al.


ORDER

I herewith approve the Reports and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty dated March 19, 2012, and May 2, 2012, no objections having been filed. "'[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.''' School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).

Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint (document no. 15) is denied. All federal claims for relief asserted in the plaintiff's complaint (document no. 1) are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's claims asserting violations of the Laaman Consent Decree and any state law claims that he had intended to assert here are dismissed without prejudice to his filing an action asserting such claims in state court.

SO ORDERED.

_________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

United States District Judge

cc: Shawn Stayrook, pro se


Summaries of

Stayrook v. Masse

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
May 24, 2012
Case No. 11-cv-426-SM (D.N.H. May. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Stayrook v. Masse

Case Details

Full title:Shawn Stayrook v. FNU Masse, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Date published: May 24, 2012

Citations

Case No. 11-cv-426-SM (D.N.H. May. 24, 2012)