From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Staub v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 29, 1968
29 A.D.2d 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

February 29, 1968


Order entered on or about September 30, 1966, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, without costs or disbursements and the motion denied. It was an improvident exercise of discretion to grant the application of the infant to file a notice of claim some 11 months after the cause of action accrued. (General Municipal Law, § 50-e). The infant was 17 years of age and relief was sought primarily on the familiar allegation that neither he nor his father knew of the necessity for filing a claim within the statutory period of 90 days. There has been a complete failure to show a cognizable relation between the fact of infancy and the failure to file a claim within the statutory time limitation. ( Schnee v. City of New York, 285 App. Div. 113 0, affd. 1 N.Y.2d 697.)

Concur — Stevens, J.P., Steuer, Tilzer, Rabin and Bastow, JJ.


Summaries of

Staub v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 29, 1968
29 A.D.2d 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Staub v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:IRVING STAUB, as Natural Guardian and Father of the Infant ERIK STAUB…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 29, 1968

Citations

29 A.D.2d 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Young v. Spencerport Cent. Sch. Dist

In the Chao case, the court permitted the filing of a late notice of claim on behalf of an infant 15 years of…

Chao v. Westhill Central School District

Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: In denying…