From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Statman v. Yavne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 20, 2004
10 A.D.3d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2004-02679

September 20, 2004.

Before: Altman, J.P., Goldstein, Schmidt, Cozier and Skelos, JJ., concur.


In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O'Donoghue, J.), dated February 23, 2004, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) to vacate an order of the same court dated January 8, 2003, granting the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3404, upon the plaintiffs' default in opposing the motion.

Ordered that the order dated February 23, 2004, is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion to vacate the order dated January 8, 2003, is granted, the order dated January 8, 2003, is vacated, and the motion to dismiss the complaint is denied.

"CPLR 3404 should be reserved strictly for cases that have reached the trial calendar" ( Lopez v. Imperial Delivery Serv., 282 AD2d 190, 199). Accordingly, since the present action was never placed on the trial calendar, the Supreme Court erred in granting the defendants' motion to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3404.


Summaries of

Statman v. Yavne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 20, 2004
10 A.D.3d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Statman v. Yavne

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH STATMAN et al., Appellants, v. LIBBY YAVNE et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 20, 2004

Citations

10 A.D.3d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
781 N.Y.S.2d 743

Citing Cases

Ittayem v. U.S. Bank

009 Foreclosure Action prior to the commencement of the instant action and that the proceeding was thereafter…