From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Staten Island Savings Bank v. Bayview Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1998
251 A.D.2d 320 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 1, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

To establish a prima facie case in a motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, the movant must demonstrate the existence of the instrument and a failure to make the payments called for by its terms (see, Interman Indus. Prods. v. R.S.M. Electron Power, 37 N.Y.2d 151, 155). The plaintiff's submission of the note, along with the appellant's guaranty, together with proof that payments were not made according to the terms thereof, clearly establishes the plaintiffs prima facie entitlement to summary judgment.

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.

We find no basis for awarding sanctions on this appeal.

Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Staten Island Savings Bank v. Bayview Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1998
251 A.D.2d 320 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Staten Island Savings Bank v. Bayview Assoc

Case Details

Full title:STATEN ISLAND SAVINGS BANK, Respondent, v. BAYVIEW ASSOCIATES et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 320 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
673 N.Y.S.2d 1017

Citing Cases

Comm. Bank, N.A. v. Metro-Tech Contr. Corp.

As a threshold rule to succeed under CPLR 3213, the plaintiff must first establish a prima facie case by…