From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

STATE v. ZOLD

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Apr 24, 1970
110 N.J. Super. 33 (App. Div. 1970)

Opinion

Argued April 13, 1970 —

Decided April 24, 1970. Camden County.

Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and KOLOVSKY.

Mr. Daniel R. Coburn, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).

Mr. Robert L. Messick, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. A. Donald Bigley, Camden County Prosecutor, attorney).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons given by Judge Peel in his opinion denying post-conviction relief. 105 N.J. Super. 194 (Law Div. 1969).

All other questions raised are concluded against defendant by the opinion (unreported) of this court affirming the conviction on the direct appeal.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

STATE v. ZOLD

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Apr 24, 1970
110 N.J. Super. 33 (App. Div. 1970)
Case details for

STATE v. ZOLD

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DOUGLAS ZOLD…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Apr 24, 1970

Citations

110 N.J. Super. 33 (App. Div. 1970)
264 A.2d 257

Citing Cases

In re Professional Ethics Opinion 452

Also in Opinion 5, 86 N.J.L.J. 361 (1963), we held that an attorney who serves as municipal prosecutor should…

Tully v. Scheu

(Emphasis added). See also State v. Zold, 105 N.J. Super. 194, 251 A.2d 475, 480 (1969), aff'd, 110 N.J.…