From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Young

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Mar 14, 1995
528 N.W.2d 417 (Wis. 1995)

Opinion

No. 93-0387-CR.

Oral argument November 10, 1994. —

Decided March 14, 1995.

REVIEW of a published decision of the Court of Appeals affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Milwaukee County, John A. Franke, Judge. Affirmed.

For the defendant-appellant-petitioner there was a brief by Michael J. Steinle and Law Office of Michael J. Steinle, Milwaukee and oral argument by Michael J. Steinle.

For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle.


The court is equally divided on the question of whether to affirm or reverse the decision of the court of appeals. Justice DAY, Justice STEINMETZ, and Justice WILCOX would affirm; Chief Justice HEFFERNAN, Justice ABRAHAMSON, and Justice BABLITCH would reverse. Justice GESKE withdrew from participation.

Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

By the Court. — The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Young

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Mar 14, 1995
528 N.W.2d 417 (Wis. 1995)
Case details for

State v. Young

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jay YOUNG…

Court:Supreme Court of Wisconsin

Date published: Mar 14, 1995

Citations

528 N.W.2d 417 (Wis. 1995)
528 N.W.2d 417

Citing Cases

Tops Club v. City of Milwaukee

¶ 6. "Absent a constitutional infirmity, courts must apply statutes as they are written, unless to do so…

State v. Torres

As a result of this conviction, Torres was automatically subject to a penalty enhancer, which doubled his…