From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Yamada

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Dec 6, 2007
116 Haw. 422 (Haw. Ct. App. 2007)

Summary

holding that a photographic array in black and white of photographs in two rows of three titled “HONOLULU POLICE” did not violate the second prong of the Kutzen test where there were no internal police markings or mug shot identification numbers

Summary of this case from State v. Vacchelli

Opinion

No. 27778.

December 6, 2007.

appeal from the First Circuit Court, CR No. 03-1-1509, Michael A. Town, J.

Harrison L. Kiehm, on the briefs, for Defendant-Appellant.

James M. Anderson, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, City and County of Honolulu, on the briefs, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

RECKTENWALD, C.J., WATANABE and FOLEY, JJ.



Summaries of

State v. Yamada

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Dec 6, 2007
116 Haw. 422 (Haw. Ct. App. 2007)

holding that a photographic array in black and white of photographs in two rows of three titled “HONOLULU POLICE” did not violate the second prong of the Kutzen test where there were no internal police markings or mug shot identification numbers

Summary of this case from State v. Vacchelli
Case details for

State v. Yamada

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Hawai'i, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kaleokalani YAMADA…

Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii

Date published: Dec 6, 2007

Citations

116 Haw. 422 (Haw. Ct. App. 2007)
173 P.3d 569

Citing Cases

Yamada v. Thomas

Judgment was entered on January 25, 2006. State v. Yamada, 116 Hawai`i 422, 431, 173 P.3d 569, 578 (Ct. App.…

State v. Vacchelli

The manner and introduction at trial must be such that it does not draw particular attention to the source or…