From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Woods

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 14, 1993
856 P.2d 321 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

92C-20826; CA A77593

Submitted on record and briefs June 10, 1993

Affirmed July 14, 1993

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County.

Richard D. Barber, Judge.

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Diane L. Alessi, Chief Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Kaye E. Sunderland, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Pursuant to plea negotiations, defendant pled guilty to the offense of being a "felon in possession of a firearm." ORS 166.270. The court then dismissed a charge of robbery, on motion of the state. Defendant challenges the term of post-prison supervision imposed. Although the state concedes that the court erred, we do not have authority to review the claim of error, because the sentence resulted from a plea agreement. ORS 138.222(2)(d); State v. Adams, 315 Or. 359, 847 P.2d 397 (1993); State v. Kilborn, 120 Or. App. 462, 852 P.2d 935 (1993); State v. Johnston, 120 Or. App. 165, 851 P.2d 1156 (1993).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Woods

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 14, 1993
856 P.2d 321 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

State v. Woods

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CHESTER B. WOODS, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 14, 1993

Citations

856 P.2d 321 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
856 P.2d 321

Citing Cases

State v. Jones

" (Citations omitted.) We are not bound by the state's concession of error in our disposition of the case,…

State v. Smith

He assigns error to the court's imposition of 60 months post-prison supervision on each conviction. The state…