From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wise

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 18, 2014
2014-UP-224 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 18, 2014)

Opinion

2014-UP-224

06-18-2014

The State, Respondent, v. James E. Wise, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2013-000196

James E. Wise, pro se. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Heard April 1, 2014

Appeal From Newberry County Frank R. Addy, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

James E. Wise, pro se.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Rule 29(a), SCRCrimP ("Except for motions for new trials based on after-discovered evidence, post-trial motions shall be made within ten (10) days after the imposition of the sentence."); State v. Taylor, 348 S.C. 152, 160-61, 558 S.E.2d 917, 921 (Ct. App. 2001) (noting a motion for a verdict in arrest of judgment is a post-trial motion), aff'd, 355 S.C. 392, 585 S.E.2d 303 (2003); State v. Campbell, 376 S.C. 212, 215, 656 S.E.2d 371, 373 (2008) ("[A] trial judge is without jurisdiction to consider a criminal matter once the term of court during which judgment was entered expires."); id. at 216, 656 S.E.2d at 373 ("[I]f [a] motion is not made within ten days of sentencing, the court will be without jurisdiction to entertain the motion.").

AFFIRMED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Wise

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 18, 2014
2014-UP-224 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 18, 2014)
Case details for

State v. Wise

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. James E. Wise, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 18, 2014

Citations

2014-UP-224 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 18, 2014)