From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Winkelman

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 3, 1976
545 P.2d 601 (Or. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. 92739, CA 5230

Argued January 23, 1976.

Reversed and remanded February 3, 1976.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clackamas County, Howard J. Blanding, Judge.

John W. Burgess, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Attorney General, and W. Michael Gillette, Solicitor General, Salem.

James W. O'Leary, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Foley and Fort, Judges.

Reversed and remanded.


PER CURIAM.



ORS 609.095(6) reads:

"A dog is a public nuisance if it:

"* * * * *

"(6) Disturbs any person by frequent or prolonged noises * * *."

The sole issue is whether this statute is unconstitutionally vague. We hold that it is not. State v. Marker, 21 Or. App. 671, 536 P.2d 1273 (1975).

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Winkelman

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 3, 1976
545 P.2d 601 (Or. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

State v. Winkelman

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. MARGARET ANN WINKELMAN, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 3, 1976

Citations

545 P.2d 601 (Or. Ct. App. 1976)
545 P.2d 601

Citing Cases

State v. Taylor

The Court held that "such exactness is not required." Id; see also State v. Winkelman, 545 P.2d 601,…

State v. Singer

Our holding that the phrase "any person" in this ordinance is not unconstitutionally vague is further…