Opinion
No.2020-KH-00069
08-14-2020
Writ application denied.
Johnson, C.J., would grant and docket and assigns reasons.
Weimer, J., would grant to address the retroactivity of Ramos v. Louisiana, 140 S. Ct. 1390, 206 L. Ed. 2d 583 (2020).
On Supervisory Writ to the 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Washington
JOHNSON, C.J., would grant and docket and assigns reasons:
I would grant the writ to clarify that the Supreme Court's recent decision in Ramos v. Louisiana , ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 1390, 206 L.Ed.2d 583 (2020) should be applied retroactively to cases on state collateral review. It is time we abandoned our use of Teague v. Lane , 489 U.S. 288, 109 S.Ct. 1060, 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989) in favor of a retroactivity test that takes into account the harm done by the past use of non-unanimous jury verdicts in Louisiana courts.
Regardless of the words or legal grounds a defendant uses to challenge his conviction, and for the reasons I explain further in State v. Gipson , 19-01815 (La. 06/03/20), 296 So.3d 1051, I believe Ramos should apply to anyone convicted by a non-unanimous jury.