From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wilbanks

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 15, 1994
450 S.E.2d 293 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

A94A2457.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 15, 1994.

Motion to suppress. Murray Superior Court. Before Judge Boyett.

Jack O. Partain III, District Attorney, Kermit N. McManus, Assistant District Attorney, for appellant.

Little Adams, Robert B. Adams, for appellee.


The State appeals the trial court's order granting appellee William Bradford Wilbanks' motion to suppress in the revocation of probation hearing below as a direct appeal of a ruling in a criminal case pursuant to OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (4).

Inasmuch as a revocation of probation hearing is not a criminal proceeding, Smith v. State, 171 Ga. App. 279, 281 ( 319 S.E.2d 113) (1984), we lack direct appeal jurisdiction in the case at bar. OCGA § 5-7-1 (a). Jurisdiction lies upon application only. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (5). Rebich v. Miles, 264 Ga. 467, 468-469 ( 448 S.E.2d 192) (1994). See also Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734 ( 380 S.E.2d 57) (1989).

Case dismissed. Birdsong, P. J., and Ruffin, J., concur.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 15, 1994.


Summaries of

State v. Wilbanks

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 15, 1994
450 S.E.2d 293 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

State v. Wilbanks

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE v. WILBANKS

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Nov 15, 1994

Citations

450 S.E.2d 293 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994)
450 S.E.2d 293

Citing Cases

White v. State

White argues this would be true "if he was attacking the revocation of his probation, [but] the same is not…

Wells v. State

The trial court correctly stated that a probation revocation is not a criminal proceeding and must be…