From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wheeler

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Aug 2, 2013
2013 Ohio 3387 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 25633 Trial Court Case No. 2012-CR-3650

08-02-2013

STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANDREW T. WHEELER Defendant-Appellant

MATHIAS H. HECK, JR., by CARLEY J. INGRAM, Atty. Reg. #0020084, Montgomery County Prosecutor's Office, Appellate Division, Montgomery County Courts Building, P.O. Box 972, 301 West Third Street, Dayton, Ohio 45422 Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee LUCAS WILDER, Atty. Reg. #0074057, 120 West Second Street, 400 Liberty Tower, Dayton, Ohio 45402 Attorney for Defendant-Appellant


(Criminal Appeal from

Common Pleas Court)


OPINION

MATHIAS H. HECK, JR., by CARLEY J. INGRAM, Atty. Reg. #0020084, Montgomery County Prosecutor's Office, Appellate Division, Montgomery County Courts Building, P.O. Box 972, 301 West Third Street, Dayton, Ohio 45422

Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee
LUCAS WILDER, Atty. Reg. #0074057, 120 West Second Street, 400 Liberty Tower, Dayton, Ohio 45402

Attorney for Defendant-Appellant
FAIN, P.J.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Andrew Wheeler appeals from his conviction and sentence, following a guilty plea, for one count of Rape (impaired victim), in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(c). The mandatory three-year sentence imposed was agreed upon by the parties.

{¶ 2} Wheeler's assigned appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), indicating that he could find no potential assignments of error having arguable merit. By entry herein filed May 22, 2013, we afforded Wheeler the opportunity to file his own, pro se brief. He has not done so.

{¶ 3} In his brief, Wheeler's counsel states:

There were no pretrial motions or hearings. This matter did not proceed to trial. The parties jointly agreed that Mr. Wheeler would plead guilty to rape and receive three years in prison (the minimum on a first degree felony). The trial court abided by the parties' agreement. Therefore, his sentence is not reviewable under O.R.C. §2953.08(D)(1). The trial court orally notified Mr. Wheeler it would impose costs. Tr., p. 5; State v. Joseph, 125 Ohio St.3d 76 [2010-Ohio-954, 926 N.E.2d 278].
Counsel has examined whether the trial court conducted a proper Rule 11 plea. Counsel found no issue with the taking of the plea. With regard to sentencing, however, the trial court initially erred when it advised Mr. Wheeler he would be subject to post-release control for only three years. Tr., p. 11. A first degree felony rape carries a post-release control option of five years. O.R.C. §2967.28(B)(1). Nonetheless, the trial court caught its error and corrected it before sentencing was completed. Mr. Wheeler was advised he
would be subject to the five years post release control. Tr., p. 14.
Counsel also considered issues presented by Mr. Wheeler via letter. One of the issues brought to counsel's attention was the possibility that Mr. Wheeler was intoxicated when he wrote an incriminating statement. Unfortunately, counsel's review on appeal is limited to matters in the record. No motion to suppress was filed to argue on this issue. Therefore, this issue is non-reviewable.
A second issue raised was whether Mr. Wheeler was correctly explained "mandatory time." Pursuant to O.R.C. §2929.13(F)(2), prison time for a rape (a first degree felony) is mandatory. At sentencing, the trial court did not give Mr. Wheeler a treatise on what mandatory time meant but did give him a CliffsNotes version. The trial court noted, "[A]nd it's mandatory, so it's not reduced by judicial release, earned credit or furlough." Tr., p. 6. While brief, the explanation was sufficiently clear as to what mandatory time means.

{¶ 4} Based upon our review of the entire record, we find no flaws in appellate counsel's factual or legal conclusions. We have performed our duty, under Anders v. California, supra, to review the record, including the transcript of the proceeding in which Wheeler pled guilty and was sentenced, independently. We have found no potential assignments of error having arguable merit. The judgment of the trial court is Affirmed.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

FROELICH and WELBAUM, JJ., concur. Copies mailed to: Mathias H. Heck
Carley J. Ingram

Lucas W. Wilder

Andrew T. Wheeler
Hon. Barbara P. Gorman


Summaries of

State v. Wheeler

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Aug 2, 2013
2013 Ohio 3387 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Wheeler

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANDREW T. WHEELER Defendant-Appellant

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY

Date published: Aug 2, 2013

Citations

2013 Ohio 3387 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)