From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Whale

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Nov 1, 1993
863 S.W.2d 290 (Ark. 1993)

Opinion

CR 93-591

Opinion delivered November 1, 1993

1. CRIMINAL LAW — POSSESSION OF COCAINE WITH INTENT TO DELIVER — ERROR IN SENTENCING. — After convicting appellant of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver, the circuit judge erred in sentencing appellant pursuant to the provisions of the Alternative Service Act, Ark. Code Ann. 16-93-501-10 (Supp. 1991), by suspending imposition of sentence for three years and levying a fine of $2,000; intent to deliver a Schedule II controlled substance (cocaine) is a Class Y felony and a minimum sentence of ten years was obligatory under Ark. Code Ann. 5-4-301(a)(1)(F) (Supp. 1991) and 5-4-104(e)(1)(F) (Supp. 1991). 2. CRIMINAL LAW — CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OFFENDERS — SUSPENDED IMPOSITION OF SENTENCE OR PROBATION — AMENDMENT PROSPECTIVE ONLY. — Act 192 of 1993 amended Ark. Code Ann. 5-4-301(a)(1)(F) and 5-4-104(e)(1)(F) by removing language that prohibits trial courts from imposing suspended imposition of sentence or probation on controlled substance offenders, but Act 192 does not apply in this case because it does not provide for retroactive application, and thus, its operation is prospective only.

Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court; Marion Humphrey, Judge; reversed and remanded.

Winston Bryant, Att'y Gen., by: Clint Miller, Senior Asst. Att'y Gen., for appellant.

William R. Simpson, Jr., Public Defender, by: Llewellyn J. Marczuk, Deputy Public Defender, for appellee.


The State of Arkansas brings this appeal pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 36.10(c). Appellant, Samuel Lee Whale, was charged with two felony offenses: possession of less than twenty-eight grams of cocaine with intent to deliver and conspiracy to deliver cocaine. In a bench trial Whale was convicted of possession and acquitted of conspiracy.

At sentencing, over the specific objection of counsel for the state, the circuit judge sentenced appellant pursuant to the provisions of the Alternative Service Act, Ark. Code Ann. 16-93-501-10 (Supp. 1991), by suspending imposition of sentence for three years and levying a fine of $2,000.

The state objected to this disposition of the case on the ground that intent to deliver a Schedule II controlled substance (cocaine) is a Class Y felony and a minimum sentence of ten years was obligatory under Ark. Code Ann. 5-4-301(a)(1)(F) (Supp. 1991) and 5-4-104(e)(1)(F) (Supp. 1991).

In its brief the state points out, as it did in State v. Townsend, CR93-317, decided October 18, 1993, that Act 192 of 1993 amends 5-4-301(a)(1)(F) and 5-4-104(e)(1)(F) so as to remove language from the two statutes which prohibits trial courts from imposing suspended imposition of sentence or probation on controlled substance offenders. The state further points out that Act 192 does not apply in this case because it does not provide for retroactive application and thus its operation is prospective only. See Redmon v. State, 265 Ark. 774, 580 S.W.2d 945 (1975); Degler v. State, 257 Ark. 388, 517 S.W.2d 515 (1974).

The state's contention must be sustained. We addressed this identical issue just two weeks ago in State v. Townsend, 314 Ark. 427, 863 S.W.2d 288 (1993), and, for the reasons there stated, the case is remanded for resentencing.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Whale

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Nov 1, 1993
863 S.W.2d 290 (Ark. 1993)
Case details for

State v. Whale

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Arkansas v. Samuel Lee WHALE

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 1, 1993

Citations

863 S.W.2d 290 (Ark. 1993)
863 S.W.2d 290

Citing Cases

Cook v. State

" We do not view the statute as unfair to the State. At time of sentencing the State presumably knows the…

State v. Williams

As we have stated on several occasions, Act 192 does not provide for retroactive application, and, thus, its…