From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wade

The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One
Jun 12, 1969
456 P.2d 343 (Wash. 1969)

Opinion

No. 40625.

June 12, 1969.

[1] Appeal and Error — Review — Frivolous Appeal — No Arguable Issue. Where the only issue raised in an appeal has been recently determined by the Supreme Court adversely to the appellant's contention, there is no arguable issue, and the appeal is frivolous.

See 5 Am.Jur.2d, Appeal and Error § 912.

Motions filed in the Supreme Court February 17, 1969 and May 12, 1969 to withdraw as counsel and to dismiss the appeal. Granted.

Edward H. McKinlay (of Horrigan, Sullivan McKinlay), for appellant (appointed counsel for appeal).

C.J. Rabideau and Laurence S. Moore, for respondent.



November 29, 1966, defendant pleaded guilty to illegal possession of a pistol. An order for a deferred sentence was entered and defendant placed on probation for 2 years.

September 30, 1968, upon motion and after hearing, an order was entered revoking the order for deferred sentence. Defendant appeals from entry of judgment and sentence upon his 1966 plea of guilty.

At all times, including this appeal, defendant has been represented by the same court appointed counsel.

The prosecuting attorney has moved to dismiss the appeal upon the grounds of frivolity, and for affirmance of the judgment and sentence. Defendant's counsel has requested permission to withdraw, for it is his belief that the appeal is frivolous. In accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), he filed a brief in support of his motion in which, among other things, he pointed out one matter — the use of some hearsay evidence at the revocation hearing — "that might arguably support the appeal."

[1] We have made a full examination of all of the proceedings. We have read the verbatim testimony of the revocation hearing. In the instant case, use of undenied hearsay evidence is within the rule we recently announced in State v. Riddell, 75 Wn.2d 85, 449 P.2d 97 (1968).

No arguable issues on the merits are presented by the record. We find that the appeal is frivolous.

Counsel's requested permission to withdraw is granted. The appeal is dismissed. The judgment and sentence is affirmed.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

State v. Wade

The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One
Jun 12, 1969
456 P.2d 343 (Wash. 1969)
Case details for

State v. Wade

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. WALTER WADE, JR., Appellant

Court:The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One

Date published: Jun 12, 1969

Citations

456 P.2d 343 (Wash. 1969)
456 P.2d 343
76 Wash. 2d 247

Citing Cases

State v. Loftin

The appeal is dismissed and the judgment and sentence stands affirmed. See State v. Chamberlain, 76 Wn.2d…

State v. Koser

That there has been an increase lately in the number of such appeals is shown by recent decisions which have…